↓ Skip to main content

A novel, fast, HMM-with-Duration implementation – for application with a new, pattern recognition informed, nanopore detector

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel, fast, HMM-with-Duration implementation – for application with a new, pattern recognition informed, nanopore detector
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2007
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-8-s7-s19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen Winters-Hilt, Carl Baribault

Abstract

Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) provide an excellent means for structure identification and feature extraction on stochastic sequential data. An HMM-with-Duration (HMMwD) is an HMM that can also exactly model the hidden-label length (recurrence) distributions - while the regular HMM will impose a best-fit geometric distribution in its modeling/representation. A Novel, Fast, HMM-with-Duration (HMMwD) Implementation is presented, and experimental results are shown that demonstrate its performance on two-state synthetic data designed to model Nanopore Detector Data. The HMMwD experimental results are compared to (i) the ideal model and to (ii) the conventional HMM. Its accuracy is clearly an improvement over the standard HMM, and matches that of the ideal solution in many cases where the standard HMM does not. Computationally, the new HMMwD has all the speed advantages of the conventional (simpler) HMM implementation. In preliminary work shown here, HMM feature extraction is then used to establish the first pattern recognition-informed (PRI) sampling control of a Nanopore Detector Device (on a "live" data-stream). The improved accuracy of the new HMMwD implementation, at the same order of computational cost as the standard HMM, is an important augmentation for applications in gene structure identification and channel current analysis, especially PRI sampling control, for example, where speed is essential. The PRI experiment was designed to inherit the high accuracy of the well characterized and distinctive blockades of the DNA hairpin molecules used as controls (or blockade "test-probes"). For this test set, the accuracy inherited is 99.9%.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
China 1 4%
South Africa 1 4%
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 23 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 25%
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 25%
Computer Science 5 18%
Chemistry 4 14%
Physics and Astronomy 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2017.
All research outputs
#5,791,756
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,152
of 7,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,363
of 77,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#13
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.