You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005956.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne L Jordan, Melanie A Holden, Elizabeth EJ Mason, Nadine E Foster |
| Abstract |
Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is a major health problem, accounting for approximately one-quarter of general practice (GP) consultations in the United Kingdom (UK). Exercise and physical activity is beneficial for the most common types of CMP, such as back and knee pain. However, poor adherence to exercise and physical activity may limit long-term effectiveness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| Canada | 2 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Norway | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,015 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 994 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 177 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 122 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 111 | 11% |
| Researcher | 80 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 61 | 6% |
| Other | 204 | 20% |
| Unknown | 260 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 276 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 189 | 19% |
| Psychology | 57 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 45 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 3% |
| Other | 113 | 11% |
| Unknown | 309 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,925,304
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,122
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,689
of 172,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.