↓ Skip to main content

SFARI Gene 2.0: a community-driven knowledgebase for the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs)

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Autism, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
634 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
388 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SFARI Gene 2.0: a community-driven knowledgebase for the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs)
Published in
Molecular Autism, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/2040-2392-4-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brett S Abrahams, Dan E Arking, Daniel B Campbell, Heather C Mefford, Eric M Morrow, Lauren A Weiss, Idan Menashe, Tim Wadkins, Sharmila Banerjee-Basu, Alan Packer

Abstract

New technologies enabling genome-wide interrogation have led to a large and rapidly growing number of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) candidate genes. Although encouraging, the volume and complexity of these data make it challenging for scientists, particularly non-geneticists, to comprehensively evaluate available evidence for individual genes. Described here is the Gene Scoring module within SFARI Gene 2.0 (https://gene.sfari.org/autdb/GS_Home.do), a platform developed to enable systematic community driven assessment of genetic evidence for individual genes with regard to ASD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 388 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 386 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 23%
Researcher 63 16%
Student > Master 39 10%
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Student > Postgraduate 17 4%
Other 56 14%
Unknown 87 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 86 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 70 18%
Neuroscience 50 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 6%
Computer Science 15 4%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 102 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,973,109
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Autism
#187
of 722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,597
of 220,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Autism
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.