Peer 5
I think the end justifies the mean. The problems with predator journals and publication of manipulated data and plagiarism are so prevalent so more studies confronting this business is warranted!
I think the end justifies the mean. The problems with predator journals and publication of manipulated data and plagiarism are so prevalent so more studies confronting this business is warranted!
Where is my previous comment? Here is a much lighter version than the previous one. I thought that PubPeer was much more open and free platform for constructive debates...
I think one needs to be careful when asserting that Nature editors agree with all statements in this article. Nature editors did not write this, they agreed to publish it, but it's the opinions of…
this may not be the correct approach to prove that they are predatory journals. The authors did practise "fraud".