↓ Skip to main content

Appetitive, dietary and health effects of almonds consumed with meals or as snacks: a randomized, controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#21 of 4,104)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
42 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
136 X users
facebook
27 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
6 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Appetitive, dietary and health effects of almonds consumed with meals or as snacks: a randomized, controlled trial
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, October 2013
DOI 10.1038/ejcn.2013.184
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Y Tan, R D Mattes

Abstract

Snacks contribute toward a significant proportion of human total daily energy intake. This study investigated the effects of almonds, a satiating and nutrient-rich, common snack, on postprandial glycemia, appetite, short-term body weight and fasting blood parameters when consumed with meals or alone as a snack.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 208 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 25%
Student > Master 28 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 9%
Researcher 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 49 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 40 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Sports and Recreations 5 2%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 64 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 459. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2024.
All research outputs
#60,383
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#21
of 4,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358
of 220,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,104 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.