You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Engineering a gender bias
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/543s31a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Flynn Murphy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 22 | 35% |
| Spain | 6 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 21 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 62% |
| Scientists | 19 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 11% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 5 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 18% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#814,771
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#29,064
of 98,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,530
of 323,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#542
of 882 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 882 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.