↓ Skip to main content

Doença cística adventicial da artéria poplítea: causa infrequente de claudicação intermitente

Overview of attention for article published in Einstein (São Paulo), August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Doença cística adventicial da artéria poplítea: causa infrequente de claudicação intermitente
Published in
Einstein (São Paulo), August 2014
DOI 10.1590/s1679-45082014rc2818
Authors

Paulo Kauffman, Sergio Kuzniec, Roberto Sacilotto, Marcelo Passos Teivelis, Nelson Wolosker, Adriano Tachibana

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Professor 1 14%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 86%
Unknown 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,983,934
of 9,210,205 outputs
Outputs from Einstein (São Paulo)
#70
of 101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,277
of 260,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Einstein (São Paulo)
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 9,210,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.