↓ Skip to main content

Physicians under the Influence: Social Psychology and Industry Marketing Strategies

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
37 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physicians under the Influence: Social Psychology and Industry Marketing Strategies
Published in
The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, January 2021
DOI 10.1111/jlme.12076
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunita Sah, Adriane Fugh‐Berman

Abstract

Pharmaceutical and medical device companies apply social psychology to influence physicians' prescribing behavior and decision making. Physicians fail to recognize their vulnerability to commercial influences due to self-serving bias, rationalization, and cognitive dissonance. Professionalism offers little protection; even the most conscious and genuine commitment to ethical behavior cannot eliminate unintentional, subconscious bias. Six principles of influence - reciprocation, commitment, social proof, liking, authority, and scarcity - are key to the industry's routine marketing strategies, which rely on the illusion that the industry is a generous avuncular partner to physicians. In order to resist industry influence, physicians must accept that they are vulnerable to subconscious bias and have both the motivation and means to resist industry influence. A culture in which accepting industry gifts engenders shame rather than gratitude will reduce conflicts of interest. If greater academic prestige accrues to distant rather than close relationships with industry, then a new social norm may emerge that promotes patient care and scientific integrity. In addition to educating faculty and students about the social psychology underlying sophisticated but potentially manipulative marketing and about how to resist it, academic medical institutions should develop strong organizational policies to counteract the medical profession's improper dependence on industry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 168 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Master 20 11%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 37 21%
Unknown 43 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 24 14%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Psychology 17 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 55 32%