↓ Skip to main content

Migraine in women: the role of hormones and their impact on vascular diseases

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Headache and Pain, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 1,555)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
61 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
25 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
301 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Migraine in women: the role of hormones and their impact on vascular diseases
Published in
The Journal of Headache and Pain, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10194-012-0424-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simona Sacco, Silvia Ricci, Diana Degan, Antonio Carolei

Abstract

Migraine is a predominantly female disorder. Menarche, menstruation, pregnancy, and menopause, and also the use of hormonal contraceptives and hormone replacement treatment may influence migraine occurrence. Migraine usually starts after menarche, occurs more frequently in the days just before or during menstruation, and ameliorates during pregnancy and menopause. Those variations are mediated by fluctuation of estrogen levels through their influence on cellular excitability or cerebral vasculature. Moreover, administration of exogenous hormones may cause worsening of migraine as may expose migrainous women to an increased risk of vascular disease. In fact, migraine with aura represents a risk factor for stroke, cardiac disease, and vascular mortality. Studies have shown that administration of combined oral contraceptives to migraineurs may further increase the risk for ischemic stroke. Consequently, in women suffering from migraine with aura caution should be deserved when prescribing combined oral contraceptives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 301 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 296 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 54 18%
Student > Master 37 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 11%
Student > Postgraduate 28 9%
Researcher 25 8%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 73 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 39%
Neuroscience 22 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Other 37 12%
Unknown 88 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 475. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#57,351
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#7
of 1,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201
of 172,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Headache and Pain
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.