↓ Skip to main content

Does dietary calcium interact with dietary fiber against colorectal cancer? A case–control study in Central Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does dietary calcium interact with dietary fiber against colorectal cancer? A case–control study in Central Europe
Published in
Nutrition Journal, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-134
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksander Galas, Malgorzata Augustyniak, Elzbieta Sochacka-Tatara

Abstract

An unfavorable trend of increasing rates of colorectal cancer has been observed across modern societies. In general, dietary factors are understood to be responsible for up to 70% of the disease's incidence, though there are still many inconsistencies regarding the impact of specific dietary items. Among the dietary minerals, calcium intake may play a crucial role in the prevention. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of intake of higher levels of dietary calcium on the risk of developing of colorectal cancer, and to evaluate dose dependent effect and to investigate possible effect modification.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 12%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 29 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Unspecified 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 30 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,396,173
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#857
of 1,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,890
of 207,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.