You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Looking for trees in the forest: summary tree from posterior samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-13-221 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph Heled, Remco R Bouckaert |
| Abstract |
Bayesian phylogenetic analysis generates a set of trees which are often condensed into a single tree representing the whole set. Many methods exist for selecting a representative topology for a set of unrooted trees, few exist for assigning branch lengths to a fixed topology, and even fewer for simultaneously setting the topology and branch lengths. However, there is very little research into locating a good representative for a set of rooted time trees like the ones obtained from a BEAST analysis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 105 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 24% |
| Researcher | 25 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 25 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 51% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,833
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,151
of 220,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#41
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.