↓ Skip to main content

Transition from turbulent to coherent flows in confined three-dimensional active fluids

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
21 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
75 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
22 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Transition from turbulent to coherent flows in confined three-dimensional active fluids
Published in
Science, March 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aal1979
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kun-Ta Wu, Jean Bernard Hishamunda, Daniel T. N. Chen, Stephen J. DeCamp, Ya-Wen Chang, Alberto Fernández-Nieves, Seth Fraden, Zvonimir Dogic

Abstract

Transport of fluid through a pipe is essential for the operation of macroscale machines and microfluidic devices. Conventional fluids only flow in response to external pressure. We demonstrate that an active isotropic fluid, composed of microtubules and molecular motors, autonomously flows through meter-long three-dimensional channels. We establish control over the magnitude, velocity profile, and direction of the self-organized flows and correlate these to the structure of the extensile microtubule bundles. The inherently three-dimensional transition from bulk-turbulent to confined-coherent flows occurs concomitantly with a transition in the bundle orientational order near the surface and is controlled by a scale-invariant criterion related to the channel profile. The nonequilibrium transition of confined isotropic active fluids can be used to engineer self-organized soft machines.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 132 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 33%
Researcher 27 20%
Student > Master 14 10%
Unspecified 13 10%
Professor 8 6%
Other 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 70 52%
Engineering 19 14%
Unspecified 16 12%
Chemical Engineering 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Other 15 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 249. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2018.
All research outputs
#41,408
of 12,172,600 outputs
Outputs from Science
#1,618
of 54,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,444
of 263,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#91
of 1,027 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,172,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,027 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.