You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
The Branching Point Approach to Conway’s Problem
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 5 |
Book title |
Formal and Natural Computing
|
Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, February 2002
|
DOI | 10.1007/3-540-45711-9_5 |
Book ISBNs |
978-3-54-043190-9, 978-3-54-045711-4
|
Authors |
Juhani Karhumäki, Ion Petre |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2017.
All research outputs
#7,523,962
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#2,489
of 8,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,363
of 118,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#11
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.