↓ Skip to main content

Protocol for CONSORT-SPI: an extension for social and psychological interventions

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol for CONSORT-SPI: an extension for social and psychological interventions
Published in
Implementation Science, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-99
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul Montgomery, Sean Grant, Sally Hopewell, Geraldine Macdonald, David Moher, Susan Michie, Evan Mayo-Wilson

Abstract

Determining the effectiveness of social and psychological interventions is important for improving individual and population health. Such interventions are complex and, where possible, are best evaluated by randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The use of research findings in policy and practice decision making is hindered by poor reporting of RCTs. Poor reporting limits the ability to replicate interventions, synthesise evidence in systematic reviews, and utilise findings for evidence-based policy and practice. The lack of guidance for reporting the specific methodological features of complex intervention RCTs contributes to poor reporting. We aim to develop an extension of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Statement for Social and Psychological Interventions (CONSORT-SPI).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 22%
Student > Master 20 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Professor 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 23 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 22%
Psychology 22 17%
Social Sciences 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 9%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 30 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#7,433,339
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,246
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,352
of 198,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#23
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.