You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of early and intensive neuro-rehabilitative treatment on muscle synergies in acute post-stroke patients: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-103 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peppino Tropea, Vito Monaco, Martina Coscia, Federico Posteraro, Silvestro Micera |
| Abstract |
After a stroke, patients show significant modifications of neural control of movement, such as abnormal muscle co-activation, and reduced selectivity and modulation of muscle activity. Nonetheless, results reported in literature do not allow to unequivocally explain whether and, in case, how a cerebrovascular accident affects muscle synergies underlying the control of the upper limb. These discrepancies suggest that a complete understanding of the modular re-organization of muscle activity due to a stroke is still lacking. This pilot study aimed at investigating the effects of the conjunction between the natural ongoing of the pathology and the intense robot-mediated treatment on muscle synergies of the paretic upper limb of subacute post-stroke patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 230 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 16% |
| Unknown | 53 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 58 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 21 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 10% |
| Unknown | 57 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,230,300
of 22,725,280 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#831
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,482
of 207,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,725,280 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them