↓ Skip to main content

Epinephrine for bronchiolitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epinephrine for bronchiolitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003123.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa Hartling, Liza M Bialy, Ben Vandermeer, Lisa Tjosvold, David W Johnson, Amy C Plint, Terry P Klassen, Hema Patel, Ricardo M Fernandes

Abstract

Bronchodilators are commonly used for acute bronchiolitis, despite uncertain effectiveness.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Denmark 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 22%
Student > Bachelor 21 17%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Postgraduate 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Other 30 24%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 66%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Unspecified 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#810,479
of 12,570,329 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,725
of 10,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#788,294
of 12,030,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,642
of 9,891 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,570,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,030,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9,891 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.