↓ Skip to main content

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular glaucoma

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for neovascular glaucoma
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007920.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arathi Simha, Andrew Braganza, Lekha Abraham, Prasanna Samuel, Kristina Lindsley

Abstract

Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a potentially blinding secondary glaucoma. It is caused by the formation of abnormal new blood vessels which prevent normal drainage of aqueous from the anterior segment of the eye. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents are specific inhibitors of the primary mediators of neovascularization. Studies have reported the effectiveness of anti-VEGFs for the control of intraocular pressure (IOP) in NVG.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 59 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 8 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 53%
Psychology 5 8%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 11 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2020.
All research outputs
#4,558,623
of 15,542,315 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,255
of 11,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,155
of 170,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,542,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.