You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Direct DNA and PNA probe binding to telomeric regions without classical in situ hybridization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Cytogenetics, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1755-8166-6-42 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew D Genet, Ian M Cartwright, Takamitsu A Kato |
| Abstract |
Fluorescence in situ Hybridization (FISH) utilizes peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probes to identify specific DNA sequences. Traditional techniques have required the heat denaturing of the DNA in formamide followed by multiple hours at moderated temperatures to allow the probe to hybridize to its specific target. Over the past 30 years, advancements in both protocols and probes have made FISH a more reliable technique for both biological research and medical diagnostics, additionally the protocol has been shortened to several minutes. These PNA probes were designed to target and hybridize to both DNA and RNA, and PNA-protein interactions still remain unclear. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Czechia | 2 | 4% |
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 30% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,386,762
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cytogenetics
#49
of 408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,942
of 213,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cytogenetics
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 408 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.