↓ Skip to main content

Automated detection and enumeration of marine wildlife using unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and thermal imagery

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
145 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
159 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Automated detection and enumeration of marine wildlife using unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and thermal imagery
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/srep45127
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. C. Seymour, J. Dale, M. Hammill, P. N. Halpin, D. W. Johnston

Abstract

Estimating animal populations is critical for wildlife management. Aerial surveys are used for generating population estimates, but can be hampered by cost, logistical complexity, and human risk. Additionally, human counts of organisms in aerial imagery can be tedious and subjective. Automated approaches show promise, but can be constrained by long setup times and difficulty discriminating animals in aggregations. We combine unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), thermal imagery and computer vision to improve traditional wildlife survey methods. During spring 2015, we flew fixed-wing UAS equipped with thermal sensors, imaging two grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) breeding colonies in eastern Canada. Human analysts counted and classified individual seals in imagery manually. Concurrently, an automated classification and detection algorithm discriminated seals based upon temperature, size, and shape of thermal signatures. Automated counts were within 95-98% of human estimates; at Saddle Island, the model estimated 894 seals compared to analyst counts of 913, and at Hay Island estimated 2188 seals compared to analysts' 2311. The algorithm improves upon shortcomings of computer vision by effectively recognizing seals in aggregations while keeping model setup time minimal. Our study illustrates how UAS, thermal imagery, and automated detection can be combined to efficiently collect population data critical to wildlife management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 284 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 21%
Researcher 50 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 67 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 28%
Environmental Science 67 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 5%
Engineering 14 5%
Computer Science 11 4%
Other 20 7%
Unknown 78 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#372,853
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#4,162
of 142,599 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,746
of 323,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#154
of 4,430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,599 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.