↓ Skip to main content

Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure amplitude during lumbar infusion in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus can predict response to shunting

Overview of attention for article published in Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure amplitude during lumbar infusion in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus can predict response to shunting
Published in
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/1743-8454-7-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Per K Eide, Are Brean

Abstract

We have previously seen that idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients having elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) pulse amplitude consistently respond to shunt surgery. In this study we explored how the cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) pulse amplitude determined during lumbar infusion testing, correlates with ICP pulse amplitude determined during over-night ICP monitoring and with response to shunt surgery. Our goal was to establish a more reliable screening procedure for selecting iNPH patients for shunt surgery using lumbar intrathecal infusion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Italy 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 56 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 6 10%
Professor 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 15 24%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 40%
Neuroscience 8 13%
Engineering 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 12 19%