↓ Skip to main content

User-held personalised information for routine care of people with severe mental illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
User-held personalised information for routine care of people with severe mental illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001711.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Farrelly, Gill E Brown, Clare Flach, Elizabeth Barley, Richard Laugharne, Claire Henderson

Abstract

It is important to seek cost-effective methods of improving the care and outcome of those with serious mental illnesses. User-held records, where the person with the illness holds all or some personal information relating to the course and care of their illness, are now the norm in some clinical settings. Their value for those with severe mental illnesses is unknown.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Unknown 186 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 17%
Student > Master 28 15%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 10%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 31 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 29%
Psychology 35 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 15%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 3%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 38 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,342,006
of 17,361,274 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,060
of 11,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,125
of 177,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,361,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.