↓ Skip to main content

The role of fecal calprotectin in investigating inflammatory bowel diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of fecal calprotectin in investigating inflammatory bowel diseases
Published in
Clinics, May 2009
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322009000500009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mustafa Erbayrak, Cansel Turkay, Elife Eraslan, Hulya Cetinkaya, Benan Kasapoglu, Mehmet Bektas

Abstract

Invasive and non-invasive tests can be used to evaluate the activity of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 67 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 8 11%
Other 5 7%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 16 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,426,944
of 13,616,025 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#96
of 469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,952
of 166,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,616,025 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.