You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Knowledge translation strategies to improve the use of evidence in public health decision making in local government: intervention design and implementation plan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-121 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca Armstrong, Elizabeth Waters, Maureen Dobbins, Laurie Anderson, Laurence Moore, Mark Petticrew, Rachel Clark, Tahna L. Pettman, Catherine Burns, Marjorie Moodie, Rebecca Conning, Boyd Swinburn |
| Abstract |
Knowledge translation strategies are an approach to increase the use of evidence within policy and practice decision-making contexts. In clinical and health service contexts, knowledge translation strategies have focused on individual behavior change, however the multi-system context of public health requires a multi-level, multi-strategy approach. This paper describes the design of and implementation plan for a knowledge translation intervention for public health decision making in local government. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 19% |
| Australia | 5 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 23% |
| Scientists | 6 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 455 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 439 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 16% |
| Researcher | 69 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 91 | 20% |
| Unknown | 88 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 85 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 9% |
| Psychology | 36 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 68 | 15% |
| Unknown | 110 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,194,225
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#192
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,590
of 223,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.