You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Daily milk intake improves vitamin B-12 status in young vegetarian Indians: an intervention trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-136 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sadanand Naik, Vijayshri Bhide, Ashish Babhulkar, Namita Mahalle, Sonali Parab, Ravi Thakre, Mohan Kulkarni |
Abstract |
Asymptomatic Indian lacto vegetarians, who make up more than half of the Indian population in different geographic regions, have distinctly low vitamin B-12 concentrations than non- vegetarians. Vegetarians consume milk but it seems that the amount is not enough to improve vitamin B-12 status or vitamin B-12 concentration in milk itself may be low. The aim of this study was to determine if daily milk consumption can improve vitamin B-12 status. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 25% |
India | 4 | 20% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 17% |
Researcher | 9 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 19% |
Unknown | 20 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 34% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 22 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#803,907
of 25,637,545 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#238
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,965
of 223,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,637,545 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.