The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
The risk associated with spinal manipulation: an overview of reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-017-0458-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sabrina Mai Nielsen, Simon Tarp, Robin Christensen, Henning Bliddal, Louise Klokker, Marius Henriksen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 25% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 5 | 8% |
| Denmark | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 48 | 80% |
| Scientists | 5 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 234 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 13% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 23% |
| Unknown | 59 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 67 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 62 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 133. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2024.
All research outputs
#335,940
of 26,629,686 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#30
of 2,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,647
of 327,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#2
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,629,686 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,313 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.