↓ Skip to main content

Influence of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Planetary Wave Resonance and Extreme Weather Events

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
596 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Influence of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Planetary Wave Resonance and Extreme Weather Events
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/srep45242
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Stefan Rahmstorf, Kai Kornhuber, Byron A. Steinman, Sonya K. Miller, Dim Coumou

Abstract

Persistent episodes of extreme weather in the Northern Hemisphere summer have been shown to be associated with the presence of high-amplitude quasi-stationary atmospheric Rossby waves within a particular wavelength range (zonal wavenumber 6-8). The underlying mechanistic relationship involves the phenomenon of quasi-resonant amplification (QRA) of synoptic-scale waves with that wavenumber range becoming trapped within an effective mid-latitude atmospheric waveguide. Recent work suggests an increase in recent decades in the occurrence of QRA-favorable conditions and associated extreme weather, possibly linked to amplified Arctic warming and thus a climate change influence. Here, we isolate a specific fingerprint in the zonal mean surface temperature profile that is associated with QRA-favorable conditions. State-of-the-art ("CMIP5") historical climate model simulations subject to anthropogenic forcing display an increase in the projection of this fingerprint that is mirrored in multiple observational surface temperature datasets. Both the models and observations suggest this signal has only recently emerged from the background noise of natural variability.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,060 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 596 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 586 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 121 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 18%
Student > Master 78 13%
Student > Bachelor 60 10%
Professor 34 6%
Other 90 15%
Unknown 104 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 162 27%
Environmental Science 114 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 6%
Engineering 31 5%
Social Sciences 20 3%
Other 92 15%
Unknown 142 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1722. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#5,469
of 23,868,111 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#82
of 128,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81
of 310,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2
of 4,386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,868,111 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.