You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Basophil Degranulation Assay
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 11 |
| Book title |
Food Allergens
|
| Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-1-4939-6925-8_11 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-6923-4, 978-1-4939-6925-8
|
| Authors |
Madhan Masilamani, Mohanapriya Kamalakannan, Hugh A. Sampson |
| Editors |
Jing Lin, Marcos Alcocer |
| Abstract |
Basophil degranulation assay has gained importance over the last decade in both diagnosis of food allergy and evaluation of progression of immunotherapy. This assay involves the identification and quantification of the expression of CD63 molecule on basophil membrane. CD63 is a marker of multivesicular bodies that is exposed to cell membrane during the process of degranulation in which the contents of basophil granules are released. This chapter describes the methodology for performing this assay. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,928,316
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,717
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,036
of 334,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#100
of 309 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 309 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.