↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007404.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

María de Lourdes Suárez-Roa, Ludovic Reveiz, Luz María Ruíz-Godoy Rivera, Juan Asbun-Bojalil, José Eduardo Dávila-Serapio, Andrés H Menjívar-Rubio, Abelardo Meneses-García

Abstract

Central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) of the jaws is a rare benign tumour with an unknown aetiology accounting for up to 7% of tumours in the mandible (lower jaw) and the maxilla (upper jaw).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 1%
Unknown 92 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Other 21 23%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 69%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Unspecified 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 13 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,296,937
of 14,229,176 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,076
of 10,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,881
of 167,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#49
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,229,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.