↓ Skip to main content

Integrated disease management interventions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
57 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated disease management interventions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009437.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annemarije L Kruis, Nynke Smidt, Willem JJ Assendelft, Jacobijn Gussekloo, Melinde RS Boland, Maureen Rutten-van Mölken, Niels H Chavannes

Abstract

In people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) there is considerable variation in symptoms, limitations and well-being, which often complicates medical care. To improve quality of life (QoL) and exercise tolerance, while reducing the number of exacerbations, a multidisciplinary program including different elements of care is needed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 1%
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 342 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 89 25%
Researcher 53 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 12%
Unspecified 37 10%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Other 102 29%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 178 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 13%
Unspecified 47 13%
Social Sciences 26 7%
Psychology 21 6%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#281,423
of 12,736,849 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#799
of 10,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,461
of 164,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,736,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.