↓ Skip to main content

Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004803.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wiebe C Verra, Lennard GH van den Boom, Wilco Jacobs, Darren J Clement, Ate AB Wymenga, Rob GHH Nelissen

Abstract

The functional and clinical basis on which to choose whether or not to retain the posterior cruciate ligament during total knee arthroplasty surgery remained unclear after a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis in 2005, which contained eight clinical trials. Several new trials have been conducted since then. Hence, an update of the review was performed.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 151 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 26 17%
Other 26 17%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Other 43 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 49%
Unspecified 36 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Engineering 7 5%
Sports and Recreations 5 3%
Other 23 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,947,095
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,342
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,831
of 162,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#47
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.