↓ Skip to main content

Human rhinoviruses and enteroviruses in influenza-like illness in Latin America

Overview of attention for article published in Virology Journal, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 3,400)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
156 X users
facebook
75 Facebook pages
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
5 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human rhinoviruses and enteroviruses in influenza-like illness in Latin America
Published in
Virology Journal, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-422x-10-305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josefina Garcia, Victoria Espejo, Martha Nelson, Merly Sovero, Manuel V Villaran, Jorge Gomez, Melvin Barrantes, Felix Sanchez, Guillermo Comach, Ana E Arango, Nicolas Aguayo, Ivette L de Rivera, Wilson Chicaiza, Mirna Jimenez, Washington Aleman, Francisco Rodriguez, Marina S Gonzales, Tadeusz J Kochel, Eric S Halsey

Abstract

Human rhinoviruses (HRVs) belong to the Picornaviridae family with high similarity to human enteroviruses (HEVs). Limited data is available from Latin America regarding the clinical presentation and strains of these viruses in respiratory disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 156 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 81 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#201,358
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Virology Journal
#18
of 3,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,429
of 223,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Virology Journal
#1
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.