↓ Skip to main content

Mind-body interventions during pregnancy for preventing or treating women's anxiety

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
333 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mind-body interventions during pregnancy for preventing or treating women's anxiety
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007559.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle Marc, Narimane Toureche, Edzard Ernst, Ellen D Hodnett, Claudine Blanchet, Sylvie Dodin, Merlin M Njoya

Abstract

Anxiety during pregnancy is a common problem. Anxiety and stress could have consequences on the course of the pregnancy and the later development of the child. Anxiety responds well to treatments such as cognitive behavioral therapy and/or medication. Non-pharmacological interventions such as mind-body interventions, known to decrease anxiety in several clinical situations, might be offered for treating and preventing anxiety during pregnancy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 333 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Australia 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 320 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 16%
Student > Bachelor 40 12%
Researcher 40 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 9%
Other 75 23%
Unknown 28 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 36%
Psychology 72 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 11%
Social Sciences 20 6%
Sports and Recreations 7 2%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 41 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#488,066
of 13,412,504 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,517
of 10,586 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#472,812
of 12,751,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,432
of 9,795 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,412,504 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,586 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 12,751,781 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9,795 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.