You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The consultants’ role in the referring process with general practitioners: partners or adjudicators? a qualitative study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Primary Care, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-14-153 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Olav Thorsen, Miriam Hartveit, Anders Baerheim |
Abstract |
Within the health system, communication between the different levels of care is essential for the patients' clinical pathways and medical treatment. This includes the referral process: how and why patients are sent from the primary care level to specialist health services. We wanted to identify and describe hospital consultants' reflections on and attitudes to the referral process and cooperation with general practitioners (GPs). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 35 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 10 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2013.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#2,212
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,339
of 223,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#42
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.