↓ Skip to main content

Antidepressants for the treatment of abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antidepressants for the treatment of abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008013.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Kaminski, Adrian Kamper, Kylie Thaler, Andrea Chapman, Gerald Gartlehner

Abstract

Abdominal pain-related functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are among the most common medical problems in paediatric medicine. Frequently, physicians prescribe antidepressants as a second-line treatment for children and adolescents with FGIDs. To date, the evidence on the benefits and harms of antidepressants for the treatment of abdominal pain-related FGIDs has not been assessed systematically.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Norway 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Researcher 16 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 16 18%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 43%
Psychology 17 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 15 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,336,131
of 14,173,817 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,982
of 10,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,204,824
of 13,416,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,451
of 9,754 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,173,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,874 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 13,416,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9,754 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.