↓ Skip to main content

Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute gallstone pancreatitis
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010326.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gurusamy KS, Nagendran M, Davidson BR

Abstract

Gallstones and alcohol account for more than 80% of acute pancreatitis. Cholecystectomy is the definitive treatment for gallstones. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred route for performing cholecystectomy. The timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after an attack of acute biliary pancreatitis is controversial.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 10%
Other 11 9%
Other 35 28%
Unknown 14 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Arts and Humanities 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 21 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,562,093
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,540
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,879
of 161,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.