↓ Skip to main content

Reducing Crime and Violence: Experimental Evidence from Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Liberia.

Overview of attention for article published in American Economic Review, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
9 policy sources
twitter
137 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
162 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
328 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reducing Crime and Violence: Experimental Evidence from Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Liberia.
Published in
American Economic Review, April 2017
DOI 10.1257/aer.20150503
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Blattman, Julian C Jamison, Margaret Sheridan

Abstract

We show that a number of noncognitive skills and preferences, including patience and identity, are malleable in adults, and that investments in them reduce crime and violence. We recruited criminally engaged men and randomized one-half to eight weeks of cognitive behavioral therapy designed to foster self-regulation, patience, and a noncriminal identity and lifestyle. We also randomized $200 grants. Cash alone and therapy alone initially reduced crime and violence, but effects dissipated over time. When cash followed therapy, crime and violence decreased dramatically for at least a year. We hypothesize that cash reinforced therapy's impacts by prolonging learning-by-doing, lifestyle changes, and self-investment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 137 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 328 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 326 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 26%
Student > Master 37 11%
Researcher 34 10%
Student > Bachelor 21 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 57 17%
Unknown 75 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 109 33%
Social Sciences 67 20%
Psychology 23 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Other 26 8%
Unknown 89 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#220,284
of 25,727,480 outputs
Outputs from American Economic Review
#136
of 4,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,631
of 325,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Economic Review
#4
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,727,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.