↓ Skip to main content

Analyzing trapped protein complexes by Virotrap and SFINX

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Protocols, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analyzing trapped protein complexes by Virotrap and SFINX
Published in
Nature Protocols, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/nprot.2017.014
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin Titeca, Emmy Van Quickelberghe, Noortje Samyn, Delphine De Sutter, Annick Verhee, Kris Gevaert, Jan Tavernier, Sven Eyckerman

Abstract

The analysis of protein interaction networks is one of the key challenges in the study of biology. It connects genotypes to phenotypes, and disruption of such networks is associated with many pathologies. Virtually all the approaches to the study of protein complexes require cell lysis, a dramatic step that obliterates cellular integrity and profoundly affects protein interactions. This protocol starts with Virotrap, a novel approach that avoids the need for cell homogenization by fusing the protein of interest to the HIV-1 Gag protein, trapping protein complexes in virus-like particles. By using the straightforward filtering index (SFINX), which is a powerful and intuitive online tool (http://sfinx.ugent.be) that enables contaminant removal from candidate lists resulting from mass-spectrometry-based analysis, we provide a complete workflow for researchers interested in mammalian protein complexes. Given direct access to mass spectrometers, researchers can process up to 24 samples in 7 d.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 23%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 24%
Unspecified 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#3,641,119
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#1,249
of 2,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,675
of 309,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#24
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.