↓ Skip to main content

Inhibitors of PEX14 disrupt protein import into glycosomes and kill Trypanosoma parasites

Overview of attention for article published in Science, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
193 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inhibitors of PEX14 disrupt protein import into glycosomes and kill Trypanosoma parasites
Published in
Science, March 2017
DOI 10.1126/science.aal1807
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Dawidowski, L Emmanouilidis, V C Kalel, K Tripsianes, K Schorpp, K Hadian, M Kaiser, P Mäser, M Kolonko, S Tanghe, A Rodriguez, W Schliebs, R Erdmann, M Sattler, G M Popowicz

Abstract

The parasitic protists of the Trypanosoma genus infect humans and domestic mammals, causing severe mortality and huge economic losses. The most threatening trypanosomiasis is Chagas disease, affecting up to 12 million people in the Americas. We report a way to selectively kill Trypanosoma by blocking glycosomal/peroxisomal import that depends on the PEX14-PEX5 protein-protein interaction. We developed small molecules that efficiently disrupt the PEX14-PEX5 interaction. This results in mislocalization of glycosomal enzymes, causing metabolic catastrophe, and it kills the parasite. High-resolution x-ray structures and nuclear magnetic resonance data enabled the efficient design of inhibitors with trypanocidal activities comparable to approved medications. These results identify PEX14 as an "Achilles' heel" of the Trypanosoma suitable for the development of new therapies against trypanosomiases and provide the structural basis for their development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 193 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 191 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 23%
Researcher 39 20%
Student > Master 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 40 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 14%
Chemistry 25 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 48 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2021.
All research outputs
#357,766
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from Science
#9,367
of 83,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,537
of 324,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#183
of 1,203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.