You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The philosophy of scientific experimentation: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Automated Experimentation, October 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1759-4499-1-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hans Radder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Iceland | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 158 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 23% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 19% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 20 | 12% |
| Philosophy | 18 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 51 | 31% |
| Unknown | 45 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,257,337
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Automated Experimentation
#6
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,251
of 107,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Automated Experimentation
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.