You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Opioid analgesic dependence: where do we go from here?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp17x690065 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane Quinlan, Farrukh Alam, Kyle Knox |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 25 | 47% |
| Australia | 4 | 8% |
| Ireland | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
| Scientists | 6 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 20% |
| Other | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 50% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#867,517
of 24,769,082 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#382
of 4,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,030
of 313,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#15
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,769,082 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.