↓ Skip to main content

Killers creating new life: caspases drive apoptosis-induced proliferation in tissue repair and disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Death & Differentiation, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Killers creating new life: caspases drive apoptosis-induced proliferation in tissue repair and disease
Published in
Cell Death & Differentiation, March 2017
DOI 10.1038/cdd.2017.47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caitlin E Fogarty, Andreas Bergmann

Abstract

Apoptosis is a carefully orchestrated and tightly controlled form of cell death, conserved across metazoans. As the executioners of apoptotic cell death, cysteine-dependent aspartate-directed proteases (caspases) are critical drivers of this cellular disassembly. Early studies of genetically programmed cell death demonstrated that the selective activation of caspases induces apoptosis and the precise elimination of excess cells, thereby sculpting structures and refining tissues. However, over the past decade there has been a fundamental shift in our understanding of the roles of caspases during cell death-a shift precipitated by the revelation that apoptotic cells actively engage with their surrounding environment throughout the death process, and caspases can trigger a myriad of signals, some of which drive concurrent cell proliferation regenerating damaged structures and building up lost tissues. This caspase-driven compensatory proliferation is referred to as apoptosis-induced proliferation (AiP). Diverse mechanisms of AiP have been found across species, ranging from planaria to mammals. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of AiP and we highlight recent advances in the field including the involvement of reactive oxygen species and macrophage-like immune cells in one form of AiP, novel regulatory mechanisms affecting caspases during AiP, and emerging clinical data demonstrating the critical importance of AiP in cancer.Cell Death and Differentiation advance online publication, 31 March 2017; doi:10.1038/cdd.2017.47.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 192 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 23%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Master 18 9%
Other 11 6%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 50 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Chemistry 7 4%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 52 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#14,056,410
of 22,962,258 outputs
Outputs from Cell Death & Differentiation
#2,295
of 3,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,803
of 309,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Death & Differentiation
#29
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,962,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.