You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ventilator associated pneumonia or ventilator induced pneumonia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine, February 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40248-017-0086-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zahid Hussain Khan, Piero Ceriana, Claudio F. Donner |
Abstract |
Ventilator associated pneumonia currently in vogue seems to have some pitfalls as far as the nomenclature is concerned and thus it imparts an erroneous impression to the reader. As the driving force is in fact the ventilator, the phraseology should preferably be changed to ventilator induced pneumonia to convey the in depth meaning of the term thus evading the terminology currently in practice. A new and emerging paradigm dealing with all side effects of mechanical ventilation can be helpful to solve this etymological conflict. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 25% |
France | 1 | 13% |
United States | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 28% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,121,912
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#95
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,187
of 324,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.