You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecology Letters, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ele.12189 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Guisan, Reid Tingley, John B Baumgartner, Ilona Naujokaitis-Lewis, Patricia R Sutcliffe, Ayesha I T Tulloch, Tracey J Regan, Lluis Brotons, Eve McDonald-Madden, Chrystal Mantyka-Pringle, Tara G Martin, Jonathan R Rhodes, Ramona Maggini, Samantha A Setterfield, Jane Elith, Mark W Schwartz, Brendan A Wintle, Olivier Broennimann, Mike Austin, Simon Ferrier, Michael R Kearney, Hugh P Possingham, Yvonne M Buckley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 21% |
| Brazil | 4 | 12% |
| Australia | 4 | 12% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 56% |
| Scientists | 11 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,419 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 24 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | <1% |
| Brazil | 13 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 10 | <1% |
| Germany | 9 | <1% |
| Australia | 9 | <1% |
| Spain | 7 | <1% |
| Italy | 7 | <1% |
| France | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 51 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2270 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 478 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 462 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 416 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 213 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 104 | 4% |
| Other | 342 | 14% |
| Unknown | 404 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1034 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 657 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 67 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 45 | 2% |
| Engineering | 23 | <1% |
| Other | 114 | 5% |
| Unknown | 479 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,022,768
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#539
of 3,186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,051
of 228,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#12
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,186 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.