↓ Skip to main content

A Complete Skull from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the Evolutionary Biology of Early Homo

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
130 news outlets
blogs
24 blogs
twitter
116 tweeters
facebook
38 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
13 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
220 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
518 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
A Complete Skull from Dmanisi, Georgia, and the Evolutionary Biology of Early Homo
Published in
Science, October 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1238484
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. Lordkipanidze, M. S. Ponce de Leon, A. Margvelashvili, Y. Rak, G. P. Rightmire, A. Vekua, C. P. E. Zollikofer

Abstract

The site of Dmanisi, Georgia, has yielded an impressive sample of hominid cranial and postcranial remains, documenting the presence of Homo outside Africa around 1.8 million years ago. Here we report on a new cranium from Dmanisi (D4500) that, together with its mandible (D2600), represents the world's first completely preserved adult hominid skull from the early Pleistocene. D4500/D2600 combines a small braincase (546 cubic centimeters) with a large prognathic face and exhibits close morphological affinities with the earliest known Homo fossils from Africa. The Dmanisi sample, which now comprises five crania, provides direct evidence for wide morphological variation within and among early Homo paleodemes. This implies the existence of a single evolving lineage of early Homo, with phylogeographic continuity across continents.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 518 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 14 3%
Germany 8 2%
United Kingdom 7 1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Other 14 3%
Unknown 452 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 130 25%
Researcher 91 18%
Student > Bachelor 75 14%
Student > Master 68 13%
Professor 36 7%
Other 117 23%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 201 39%
Social Sciences 77 15%
Arts and Humanities 56 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 48 9%
Unspecified 36 7%
Other 99 19%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1344. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2019.
All research outputs
#1,845
of 12,960,324 outputs
Outputs from Science
#142
of 60,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24
of 179,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#6
of 879 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,960,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 879 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.