↓ Skip to main content

Walking speed related joint kinetic alterations in trans-tibial amputees: impact of hydraulic 'ankle’ damping

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Walking speed related joint kinetic alterations in trans-tibial amputees: impact of hydraulic 'ankle’ damping
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-10-107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alan R De Asha, Ramesh Munjal, Jai Kulkarni, John G Buckley

Abstract

Passive prosthetic devices are set up to provide optimal function at customary walking speed and thus may function less effectively at other speeds. This partly explains why joint kinetic adaptations become more apparent in lower-limb amputees when walking at speeds other than customary. The present study determined whether a trans-tibial prosthesis incorporating a dynamic-response foot that was attached to the shank via an articulating hydraulic device (hyA-F) lessened speed-related adaptations in joint kinetics compared to when the foot was attached via a rigid, non-articulating attachment (rigF).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 24%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 31 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Sports and Recreations 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 23 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,207,295
of 22,727,570 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1,137
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,193
of 211,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,727,570 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.