↓ Skip to main content

Precursors of developmental dyslexia: an overview of the longitudinal dutch dyslexia programme study.

Overview of attention for article published in Dyslexia (10769242), January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 157)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
12 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Precursors of developmental dyslexia: an overview of the longitudinal dutch dyslexia programme study.
Published in
Dyslexia (10769242), January 2013
DOI 10.1002/dys.1463
Pubmed ID
Authors

van der Leij A, van Bergen E, van Zuijen T, de Jong P, Maurits N, Maassen B, Leij, Aryan, Bergen, Elsje, Zuijen, Titia, Jong, Peter, Maurits, Natasha, Maassen, Ben, Aryan van der Leij, Elsje van Bergen, Titia van Zuijen, Peter de Jong, Natasha Maurits, Ben Maassen

Abstract

Converging evidence suggests that developmental dyslexia is a neurobiological disorder, characterized by deficits in the auditory, visual, and linguistic domains. In the longitudinal project of the Dutch Dyslexia Programme, 180 children with a familial risk of dyslexia (FR) and a comparison group of 120 children without FR (noFR) were followed from the age of 2 months up to 9 years. Children were assessed on (1) auditory, speech, and visual event-related potentials every half year between 2 and 41 months; (2) expressive and receptive language, motor development, behaviour problems, and home-literacy environment by questionnaires at the age of 2 and 3; (3) speech-language and cognitive development from 47 months onwards; and (4) preliteracy and subskills of reading, and reading development during kindergarten and Grades 2 and 3. With regard to precursors of reading disability, first analyses showed specific differences between FR and noFR children in neurophysiological, cognitive, and early language measures. Once reading tests administered from age 7 to 9 years were available, the children were divided into three groups: FR children with and without dyslexia, and controls. Analyses of the differences between reading groups yielded distinct profiles and developmental trajectories. On early speech and visual processing, and several cognitive measures, performance of the non-dyslexic FR group differed from the dyslexic FR group and controls, indicating continuity of the influence of familial risk. Parental reading and rapid naming skills appeared to indicate their offspring's degree of familial risk. Furthermore, on rapid naming and nonverbal IQ, the non-dyslexic FR group performed similarly to the controls, suggesting protective factors. There are indications of differences between the FR and control groups, irrespective of reading outcome. These results contribute to the distinction between the deficits correlated to dyslexia as a manifest reading disorder and deficits correlated to familial risk only.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 3%
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Russian Federation 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 81 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Researcher 13 14%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 39%
Social Sciences 14 16%
Linguistics 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Unspecified 6 7%
Other 16 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2014.
All research outputs
#404,464
of 8,071,403 outputs
Outputs from Dyslexia (10769242)
#2
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,278
of 143,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dyslexia (10769242)
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,071,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,835 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them