↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for preventing lower limb soft-tissue running injuries

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
21 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for preventing lower limb soft-tissue running injuries
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001256.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon S Yeung, Ella W Yeung, Lesley D Gillespie

Abstract

Overuse soft-tissue injuries occur frequently in runners. Stretching exercises, modification of training schedules, and the use of protective devices such as braces and insoles are often advocated for prevention. This is an update of a review first published in 2001.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Netherlands 5 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 337 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 83 23%
Student > Bachelor 54 15%
Student > Postgraduate 38 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Researcher 35 10%
Other 115 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 163 45%
Sports and Recreations 69 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 44 12%
Unspecified 36 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Other 33 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2018.
All research outputs
#238,065
of 12,483,367 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#583
of 8,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,600
of 11,923,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#572
of 8,337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,483,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 11,923,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8,337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.