↓ Skip to main content

Axial lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year single-center experience

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Axial lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year single-center experience
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2013
DOI 10.2147/cia.s49802
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jon Block, Dick Zeilstra, Larry Miller

Abstract

The aim of this study is to report our 6-year single-center experience with L5-S1 axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 12%
Egypt 1 6%
Unknown 14 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 24%
Researcher 3 18%
Unspecified 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Other 1 6%
Other 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 71%
Unspecified 2 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2018.
All research outputs
#3,223,255
of 13,272,830 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#363
of 1,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,921
of 182,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#9
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,272,830 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,356 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.