↓ Skip to main content

Gravitational Lenses

Overview of attention for book
Overall attention for this book and its chapters
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gravitational Lenses
Published by
ADS, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-03758-4
ISBNs
978-3-66-203758-4, 978-3-54-066506-9
Authors

Schneider, Peter, Falco, Emilio E., Ehlers, Jürgen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Master 1 9%
Unknown 8 73%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 3 27%
Unknown 8 73%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,011,478
of 13,457,697 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#5,945
of 24,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,506
of 262,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#42
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,457,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.