You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biofilm delays wound healing: A review of the evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Burns & Trauma, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.4103/2321-3868.113329 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel G. Metcalf, Philip G. Bowler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 56% |
| Spain | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 304 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 12% |
| Researcher | 33 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 14% |
| Unknown | 92 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 23 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 7% |
| Other | 66 | 22% |
| Unknown | 99 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,407,876
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Burns & Trauma
#42
of 306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,172
of 210,219 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Burns & Trauma
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,219 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them